Pines at Waco PUD

Adjacent developer of a 92-lot single-family subdivision; opposed the density, citing standstill traffic on Speegleville, safety at the Sunnydale exit, and insufficient parking.

Co-applicant who lives on the Speegleville corridor; argued the 48-unit plan is a quality transition use and that the density objection arrived late after months of staff support.

Co-applicant and longtime Waco developer; detailed the project's history and asked the commission to weigh the assisted living facility's far higher nearby density.

Nearby resident who spoke in support of the full 48 units, citing strong housing demand and the developers' character.

Broker with Trilogy Group; argued the density is comparable to successful Waco developments and that Speegleville widening addresses traffic concerns.

Trilogy Group partner; urged keeping all 48 units, saying removing six buildings adds little and the city needs housing diversity.

Project engineer with GLS; explained that road and utility costs make a 36-unit version economically unfeasible.

Urged approval of all 48 homes, citing population growth and arguing the assisted living facility's density comparison should count.

Realtor who brokered the land assembly; supported the 48 units and vouched for the developers and Trilogy's management capacity.

Expressed strong opposition to the PUD rezoning due to traffic concerns and compatibility with nearby high-end single-family homes.